PEMERTAHANAN BAHASA MELALUI PERSPEKTIF DAFTAR KATA
Abstract
Following the recent study of Balinese language in the perspective of wordlist as part of the OCSEAN grant, this study attempt to investigate further the language maintenance of languages in Indonesia through using the same wordlist perspective of comparing 24 semantic fields provided from World Loanword Database (WOLD). Languages being compared are Balinese, Javanese, Sundanese, Muna, Toba Batak, and Toraja language. By calculating the percentage of borrowing, duplication, and replication available in specific semantic fields of the wordlist, mapping of the language maintenance in Indonesia can be initiated further into the future.
Keywords: Wordlist, Semantic Fields, Language Maintenance
References
de Cillia, R., Menz, F., Dressler, W. U., & Cech, P. (1998). Linguistic minorities in Austria. In C. B. Paulston & D. Peckham (Eds.), Linguistic minorities in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 18–36). Multilingual Matters [27, 34].
Collins, J. T. (2005). Bahasa Melayu, bahasa daerah, dan bahasa nasional: Kasus Ambon. Linguistik Indonesia, 23(2), 141–156.
Darmasetiyawan, I. M. S., Aryawibawa, I. N., and Mulyawan, I. W. (2024). Psycholinguistics. Jawa Barat: Mega Press Nusantara.
Darmasetiyawan, I. M. S. (2025). Balinese cultural representation from the perspective of the Balinese wordlist. LingTera, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v12i2.86302
Haspelmath, M. & Tadmor, U. (2009). Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442
Heggarty, P. (2010). Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of ‘word list’ comparisons. Diachronica, 27(2), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.07heg
Idaryani. (2023). The usage of kinship terms across three generations in Indonesia. Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 396. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v8i1.396
Kanojia, D., Dabre, R., Dewangan, S., Bhattacharyya, P., Haffari, G., & Kulkarni, M. (2020). Harnessing cross-lingual features to improve cognate detection for low-resource languages. In D. Scott, N. Bel, & C. Zong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2020) (pp. 1384–1395). International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.119
Kaplan, J. (2017). From lexicostatistics to lexomics: Basic vocabulary and the study of language prehistory. Osiris, 32(1), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/694093
Klamer, M., Edwards, O., Fricke, H., Gialitaki, Z., Moro, F., Palmér, A., Saad, G., Sulistyono, Y., Visser, E., and Wu, J. (2021). Practicalities of language data collection and management in and around Indonesia. Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 22(2), 467-521.
Klamer, M., & Moro, F. (Eds.). (2023). Traces of Contact in the Lexicon. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004529458
Lailiyah, N., & Wijayanti, F. I. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Jawa, Bali dan Bima: Perspektif linguistik historis komparatif. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.308
Meelen, M., Hill, N. W., & Fellner, H. (2022). What are cognates? Papers in Historical Phonology, 7, 44–80. https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.7.2022.7405
Nababan, P. W. J. (1993). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ntelu, A., & Djou, D. N. (2017). The language family relation of local languages in Gorontalo Province: A lexicostatistic study. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 6(11), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i11.1285
Pye, C. (2017). The Comparative Method of Language Acquisition Research. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Rahman, Z. A., & Agus, M. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Makassar dan bahasa Selayar: Analisis leksikostatistik dan glotokronologi. Gema Wiralodra, 13(1), 215–232.
Sulistyono, Y., & Fernandez, I. Y. (2015). Penerapan teknik leksikostatistik dalam studi komparatif bahasa Baranusa, Kedang, dan Lamaholot di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v16i1.1506
Tadmor, U., Haspelmath, M., & Taylor, B. (2012). Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica, 27, 226-246.
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tsunoda, T. (2006). Language Endangerment and Language Revitalization. OAPEN Library.
Uban, A.-S., Ciobanu, A.-M., & Dinu, L. P. (2020). A computational approach to measuring the semantic divergence of cognates. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2019) (pp. 96–108). Springer.
Wiemer, B., Wälchli, B., & Hansen, B. (Eds.). (2012). Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, Vol. 242). De Gruyter Mouton
Wu, M.-S., & List, J.-M. (2023). Annotating cognates in phylogenetic studies of Southeast Asian languages. Language Dynamics and Change, 13(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10023
